set2/image15

financial propriety. The legislature is concerned about the policies of
the government that are reflected in the budget. Through financial
control, the legislature controls the policy of the government.
No Confidence Motion: The most powerful weapon that enables
the Parliament to ensure executive accountability is the no-confidence
motion. As long as the government has the support of its party or
coalition of parties that have a majority in the Lok Sabha, the power
of the House to dismiss the government is fictional rather than real.
However, after 1989, several governments have been forced to resign
due to lack of confidence of the house. Each of these governments
lost the confidence of the Lok Sabha because they failed to retain the
support of their coalition partners.
Thus, the Parliament can effectively control the executive and
ensure a more responsive government. It is however important for
this purpose, that there is adequate time at the disposal of the House,
the members are interested in discussion and participate effectively
and there is willingness to compromise amongst the government and
the opposition. In the last two decades, there has been a gradual
decline in sessions of the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies
and time spent on debates. Moreover, the Houses of the Parliament
have been plagued by absence of quorum, boycott of sessions by
members of opposition which deprive the house the power to control
the executive through discussion.

financial propriety. The legislature is concerned about the policies of
the government that are reflected in the budget. Through financial
control, the legislature controls the policy of the government.
No Confidence Motion: The most powerful weapon that enables
the Parliament to ensure executive accountability is the no-confidence
motion. As long as the government has the support of its party or
coalition of parties that have a majority in the Lok Sabha, the power
of the House to dismiss the government is fictional rather than real.
However, after 1989, several governments have been forced to resign
due to lack of confidence of the house. Each of these governments
lost the coniidence of the Lok Sabha because they failed to retain the
support of their coalition partners.
Thus, the Parliament can effectively control the executive and
ensure a more responsive government. It is however important for
this purpose, that there is adequate time at the disposal of the House,
the members are interested in discussion and participate efi`ectjveTy
and there is willingness to compromise amongst the government and
the opposition. In the last two decades, there has been a gradual
decline in sessions of the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies
and time spent on debates. Moreover, the Houses of the Parliament
have been plagued by absence of quorum, boycott of sessions by
: members of opposition which deprive the house the power to control
the executive through discussion.